Browse thread
[Caml-list] Project Proposals
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Gerd Stolpmann <info@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCaml packaging problems |
On 2002.06.18 15:32 Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 02:57:33PM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote: > > > 1) What will be the exact name of these directories ? It would be a good > > > idea, i think at least, if we choose the same name for all > > > installations of ocaml, and not everyone choosing it's own directory. > > > (or else we could have a ocaml option similar to -where which would > > > give a pointer to these directories ? and have the choice of the > > > directory highly configurable, maybe a -where_stub or something such ?) > > > > > > Actually i have the proposition of "shlibs" from you, and "libexec" from > > > Gerd and the findlib people. and then i feel myself "stublibs" should be > > > a nice name too, especially since it is just the sub libraries we are > > > speaking about, and not the .cma and other such ocaml libraries. > > > > My proposal for "shlibs" was just for the sake of example, and isn't > > very descriptive. I like "stublibs" or "libexec" better, actually. > > I would go for stublibs myself, but the findlib folk seems keen on > libexec. Maybe we should have a long discution here on that, or you > would decide and we keep that, i don't know, i would need more opinion > on this. There is no traditional name for the directory containing dynamically loaded libraries, i.e. libraries that are not linked with "-l" into the executable. "libexec" is intended for executables that are run as a result of library calls, and that are not in PATH. I chose "libexec" because that was most close to DLLs. I don't know if this is a good name, however, and I can change it again in the findlib distribution. I think the point is whether everybody familiar with filesystem conventions finds the DLL directory immediately. Gerd -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gerd Stolpmann Telefon: +49 6151 997705 (privat) Viktoriastr. 45 64293 Darmstadt EMail: gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de Germany ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners