Browse thread
[Caml-list] productivity improvement, Ensemble as an example
- Ohad Rodeh
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ohad Rodeh <ORODEH@i...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] productivity improvement, Ensemble as an example |
Which site have you been looking at?
The Ensemble site is at www.cs.cornell.edu/Info/Projects/Ensemble, there is
a link
to it from the Horus site (www.cs.cornell.edu/Info/Projects/Horus). As for
updates,
the last time the homepage was touched was 23-July-02, and the last
distribution is
from the same date.
As for complexity, it as actually gone done, and we've been able to throw
away some
code as OCaml has evolved. I don't think C has evolved much (C99 ?) in any
way that
it had helped us.
You can take my word for it, the line count, complexity etc. in a C version
that does the
same as Ensemble was a lot higher.
Ohad.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ohad Rodeh
tel: +972-3-6401641
IBM Haifa, storage research
Oleg
<oleg_inconnu@myrealbo To: sajuma@utu.fi
x.com> cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Sent by: Subject: [Caml-list] productivity improvement (was: Rule based
owner-caml-list@pauill language)
ac.inria.fr
27/07/2002 12:08
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 06:31 pm, sajuma@utu.fi wrote:
> Anyway, problems in memory management and modularity
> only appear when the programs become big. Usually big
> programs are not written in two languages, so comparison
> is hard. But the example of Horus vs. Ensemble shows that
> there is very large improvement.
Do you have links/references? (Although the fact that ML is more productive
than C is quite believable to me) I found Horus/Ensemble web site. It looks
like it has not been updated in 5 years[1]
> [...] why are you using C++?
It's very easy to give simple examples of when C++ is much more productive
than C in programs defined by their I/O (If anyone needs such examples: a)
reverse a file, b) reverse lines in a file c) /usr/bin/sort ). The
situation
seems to be different with O'Caml vs C++.
Regards,
Oleg
[1] Maybe the complexity has cought up with them eventually :)
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives:
http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ:
http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners