Browse thread
[Caml-list] simple typing question
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Pierre Weis <pierre.weis@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] simple typing question |
> what about changing the semantic of partial application, restoring
> eta-equivalence: a function is not evaluated unless every arguments
> are given:
Could you precisely state this notion ? In the presence of higher
order functions and imperative features, this does not appear to be
simple and evident to me...
(Let alone recursive functions and types as in
$ ocaml -rectypes
Objective Caml version 3.04+15 (2002-06-18)
# let rec print x = print_int x; print;;
val print : int -> 'a as 'a = <fun>
# print 1 2 3;;
123- : int -> 'a as 'a = <fun>
)
Best regards,
Pierre Weis
INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://pauillac.inria.fr/~weis/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners