Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Bigarray map & set/get (long)
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Bigarray map & set/get (long)

> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:11:08 -0700
> From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
> 
> [*] My current list of needed/wanted language features:
> 
> 1. operator overloading/generics for making math less ugly and painful
> 2. module recursion
> 3. views for pattern matching abstract data types
> 
> I added views to my want-list relatively recently (6 months ago?) as I 
> started trying to do more interesting stuff.  I can't believe the conflict 
> between wanting to pattern match like you're supposed to in ml and wanting 
> to abstract data types like you're supposed to in ml doesn't get more 
> attention in the functional programming community.  It seems like a glaring 
> problem, but maybe I'm missing something.
> 

Could you give an example?  I'm a bit fuzzy on what you mean by this.

Mike
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners