Browse thread
[Caml-list] Bigarray map & set/get (long)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Michael Vanier <mvanier@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Bigarray map & set/get (long) |
> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:11:08 -0700 > From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com> > > [*] My current list of needed/wanted language features: > > 1. operator overloading/generics for making math less ugly and painful > 2. module recursion > 3. views for pattern matching abstract data types > > I added views to my want-list relatively recently (6 months ago?) as I > started trying to do more interesting stuff. I can't believe the conflict > between wanting to pattern match like you're supposed to in ml and wanting > to abstract data types like you're supposed to in ml doesn't get more > attention in the functional programming community. It seems like a glaring > problem, but maybe I'm missing something. > Could you give an example? I'm a bit fuzzy on what you mean by this. Mike ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners