Browse thread
[Caml-list] simple typing question
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Pixel <pixel@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] simple typing question |
Pierre Weis <pierre.weis@inria.fr> writes:
> > what about changing the semantic of partial application, restoring
> > eta-equivalence: a function is not evaluated unless every arguments
> > are given:
>
> Could you precisely state this notion ? In the presence of higher
> order functions and imperative features, this does not appear to be
> simple and evident to me...
well, wrap every functions:
# let make_toggle_ () =
let r = ref [] in fun x -> let old = !r in r := x; old
with
# let make_toggle a b = make_toggle_ a b
based on the number of parameters of functions (given by the type).
This disables evaluation of a function until every parameters are
provided.
The program transformation involved is something like:
let t = foo in fun x -> bar
gives
fun x -> let t = foo in bar
ie
(fun t -> (fun x -> bar)) foo
gives
(fun x -> (fun t -> bar) foo)
> (Let alone recursive functions and types as in
> $ ocaml -rectypes
> # let rec print x = print_int x; print;;
> val print : int -> 'a as 'a = <fun>
> # print 1 2 3;;
> 123- : int -> 'a as 'a = <fun>
of course it doesn't work nicely for this since the "number of
parameters" doesn't mean anything, so you can't know when you can
start evaluating.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners