Hi

berke@altern.org wrote:
> 
> I agree. 

I agree with you both. Though I succeeded in recompiling the _full_ CDK
both on Solaris and Linux (never tried win32), it doesn't even approach
the ease and integratedness of Python(+distutils). Though the collection
itself is of course great.

Alexander

I experienced similar problems with CDK. I just wanted
> the X11 code. Had lot of problems, I thought that it didn't
> like OpenBSD, I tried on Linux. Also, having to recompile Ocaml
> isn't very convenient, and it's tricky to compile CDK with an
> already compiled Ocaml (I didn't manage... I haven't spent a full
> week on it, though).
> 
> So I'd really like to have a CDK that compiles easily and cleanly on
> a UNIX box, and that doesn't need a specific Ocaml version. I mean,
> patching the compiler to install a X lib doesn't sound good to me.
> --
> Berke
> 
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners