Francois Pottier wrote:
>>Is there any specific reason for not having a Queue.fold 
>>function in the standard library?
> 
> 
> Your version of fold empties the queue as a side effect, which is
> usually not part of the semantics of fold.
> 
> That said, there is an implementation of Queue.fold in the CVS version of
> O'Caml (along with a slightly more efficient implementation of all Queue
> functions).

Give me O'Caml 3.05! Please...

Thank you for pointing out the nasty side-effects of my 
implementation. Now I fixed it.

Alex



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners