Dmitry Bely wrote:
 > Do not private Ocaml methods have in fact "protected" C++ semantics?
 > They cannot be called directly but can be used in methods of inherited
 > classes...

This was my impression as well. I think it would be a good idea to add
something to the FAQ about how UML-ish/Java-ish
private/protected/public/package visibility maps to O'Caml. And, if
there isn't a direct mapping in some cases, then perhaps explanations of
"workarounds" like the ones presented in this thread.

Thanks,
Brian



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners