Dmitry Bely wrote:
> Do not private Ocaml methods have in fact "protected" C++ semantics? They
> cannot be called directly but can be used in methods of inherited
> classes...
> 
> - Dmitry Bely

I thought so, too. I made several atttempts, and the 
compiler seemed to reject all of them. Let me see if I can 
cook up a quick example.

# class a = object method private m : unit = (new a) # m end;;
The expression "new a" has type a = <  > but is used with type
   < m : unit; .. >
Only the second object type has a method m

Alex

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners