>Could you give an example?  I'm a bit fuzzy on what you mean by this.

By which?  Views?

http://www.google.com/search?q=views+pattern+matching+abstract+data+types

Chris


At 22:44 7/25/02 -0700, Michael Vanier wrote:

> > Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:11:08 -0700
> > From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
> >
> > [*] My current list of needed/wanted language features:
> >
> > 1. operator overloading/generics for making math less ugly and painful
> > 2. module recursion
> > 3. views for pattern matching abstract data types
> >
> > I added views to my want-list relatively recently (6 months ago?) as I
> > started trying to do more interesting stuff.  I can't believe the conflict
> > between wanting to pattern match like you're supposed to in ml and wanting
> > to abstract data types like you're supposed to in ml doesn't get more
> > attention in the functional programming community.  It seems like a 
> glaring
> > problem, but maybe I'm missing something.
> >
>
>Could you give an example?  I'm a bit fuzzy on what you mean by this.
>
>Mike
>-------------------
>To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
>Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
>Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners