Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Caml productivity.
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Alexander V.Voinov <avv@q...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml productivity.
Hi All,

From: "Pal-Kristian Engstad" <>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Caml productivity.
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:22:32 -0700

> Now, I am not saying that C or C++ is inherently that much better. Even
> gcc's inline syntax is really awkward in practice. But I would love to see a
> superior system in ocaml! So, what is needed in order to support inline
> assembly in ocaml? Is it at all possible?

Arity/Prolog had inline C. It was very, _very_ useful.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: