Yes, I meant about views.  Thanks.  Here's a good reference:

http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/5295.html

Mike

> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:33:06 -0700
> From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
> 
> >Could you give an example?  I'm a bit fuzzy on what you mean by this.
> 
> By which?  Views?
> 
> http://www.google.com/search?q=views+pattern+matching+abstract+data+types
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> At 22:44 7/25/02 -0700, Michael Vanier wrote:
> 
> > > Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:11:08 -0700
> > > From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
> > >
> > > [*] My current list of needed/wanted language features:
> > >
> > > 1. operator overloading/generics for making math less ugly and painful
> > > 2. module recursion
> > > 3. views for pattern matching abstract data types
> > >
> > > I added views to my want-list relatively recently (6 months ago?) as I
> > > started trying to do more interesting stuff.  I can't believe the conflict
> > > between wanting to pattern match like you're supposed to in ml and wanting
> > > to abstract data types like you're supposed to in ml doesn't get more
> > > attention in the functional programming community.  It seems like a 
> > glaring
> > > problem, but maybe I'm missing something.
> > >
> >
> >Could you give an example?  I'm a bit fuzzy on what you mean by this.
> >
> >Mike
> >-------------------
> >To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> >Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> >Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> 
> 
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners