Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
>  To sum up, IMHO solutions 1-3 are different and solve different problems.
>  4 is not so promising as it seems. Finally it is nice to see some
>  interest in this field in the ocaml community.

I more or less agree with you. I would like to be able to 
process XML documents in the most efficient way possible 
(which implies using O'Caml :-) ), while taking advantage of 
the currently available *standard* technology (XSLT, XPath).


Let me restate my primary request: is anyone interested in 
constituting an XML/O'Caml task force, for the sake of 
defining and implementing the official O'Caml XML processing 
API / tools. I volunteer for it, but I will not take up the 
task by myself.

Alex

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners