Browse thread
[Caml-list] Protected methods
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alessandro Baretta <alex@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Protected methods |
Dmitry Bely wrote: > Alessandro Baretta <alex@baretta.com> writes: > > But why do you need to call other instance's private/protected > methods? Maybe you should slightly change your design? Could you roughly > describe your task? > > - Dmitry Bely Yes. I have a class whose instances are responsible for formatting specific XML trees. Each instance is responsible for generating a text box which is decomposed in a header, a body, and a footer. While a given object handles directly the body of a text box, it delegates the header and the footer to two other instances of the same class, in a "has-a" relation with the former. This decomposition can be done recursively, thereby yielding an object tree or hierarchy. There are methods that are only meaningful when called by the body object on the header and footer objects. Client classes of this text box class are not supposed to invoke those methods that are used for data exchange between two objects associated by the above "has-a" relation. Alex ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners