Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] productivity improvement
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Oleg <oleg_inconnu@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] productivity improvement |
On Friday 19 July 2002 03:03 am, Issac Trotts wrote: > Right, so how is your C++ compiler going to remind you when you forget to > include a needed case in the switch statement (assuming there is something > in the typeinfo to switch on; you can't switch on a string in C++.) OCaml > will remind you, but I don't see how a C++ compiler could. Correct. Since C++ compiler can not possibly know of all existent sub-types, there is no way it can warn you. This is why virtual member functions are still preferred. Regards Oleg ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners