Browse thread
[Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but...
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but... |
* Alexander V. Voinov (avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru) wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Alan Schmitt wrote: > > - make recompiling easy (in my dream world, when I recompile ocaml, I'd > > like to be able to recompile all the libraries and apps that depend on > > it with one command). > > Again, _why_ do you want to recompile ocaml? Both me and Dave and Berke > emphasized that a key to the adoption of this intergrated kit is that it > compiles with the stock binary version of ocaml for the respective > platform. I can't understand the reason to have a special version of > ocaml for CDK. What I meant was "when a new version of ocaml comes out, or when I want to recompile ocaml from cvs, ...". At the moment, each time I install a new version of ocaml, I need to recompile all librairies that depend on the standard library if it has changed a bit. Same thing if I get a new version of, say, lablgtk, with all my gtk apps. So I don't mean to have a special version of ocaml with any packaging system, just to be able to handle dependencies among librairies. Best, Alan -- The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners