On Fri, 05 Jul 2002, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm afraid our approach does not work, for several
> reasons. First of all, many of the libraries included are developed by
> other persons, and we need to manually take their changes into the
> libraries included, which is a pain. Another problem is the one you
> describe: we provide a bundle that is not easy to cut in pieces.

Which indicates again, how badly we need packaging standards for OCaml...

Regards,
Markus Mottl

-- 
Markus Mottl                                             markus@oefai.at
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence                  http://www.oefai.at/~markus
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners