Browse thread
[Caml-list] productivity improvement
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Max Skaller <skaller@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Array.resize ? |
Olivier Andrieu wrote: > John Max Skaller [Friday 12 July 2002] : > > Similar for Strings .. though IMHO module String should be > > deprecated: we don't need Strings when we have Arrays. > >You mean throwing away, the compact, C-compatible representation of >strings > > and using instead some `char array' (that is, arrays of 32bits > That is an optimisation problem for the compiler. 32 bits is the right size for a Unicode character - but byte arrays are still useful. -- John Max Skaller, mailto:skaller@ozemail.com.au snail:10/1 Toxteth Rd, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia. voice:61-2-9660-0850 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners