[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-08-07 (12:34) |
From: | David Fox <david@l...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-mode-3.05 |
Jeffrey Palmer <jeffrey.palmer@acm.org> writes: > Can anyone give a quick comparison of the Tuareg ocaml mode and > ocaml-mode-3.05? Is the indentation better/standardized in one vs. the other, > support for font-locking, etc. > > I'm using Tuareg now, but I was thinking that if this is the > "standard" ocaml mode, now might be the time to switch. I just tried out ocaml-mode-3.05, but it is difficult to perform a comparison because the colorization of the two modes is quite different and customization is not straightforward. It would be unfair to do a comparison without first minimizing the gratuitous differences between the two. I did notice that when I loaded a buffer in ocaml-mode the comments were not colorized properly, though when I toggled font-lock mode off and on they came out right. This is also my main problem with tuareg mode - mysterious colorization behavior. I'm pretty sure the indentation will not be a big issue for me. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners