Browse thread
[Caml-list] Cyclic ?!
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-08-15 (17:25) |
From: | Oleg <oleg_inconnu@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Cyclic ?! |
Hi I'm not sure I understand you. If the two definitions are equivalent WRT Empty <-> None & Node <-> Some name substitution, then the fact that the compiler accepts one, but not the other must be a bug, yes? Regards Oleg On Thursday 15 August 2002 10:31 am, Michael Hicks wrote: > If memory serves, ML datatypes elegantly overload about three distrinct > type-theoretic constructs. In particular, the variant tags in the data > type definition double as the "witnesses" to coercions between an > iso-recursive type and its "unrolling" of one level. Without going into > detail, this is why you can define something like > > type foo = Rec of foo;; > > but you can't define > > type foo = foo;; > > The latter definition is in the style of "equi-recursive" types, in > which a recursive type is equivalent any number of its unrollings. This > formulation is harder to typecheck, as I recall. There is a similar > analogy between the two definitions of bin_tree that you present. > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr > [mailto:owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Oleg > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:20 PM > To: caml-list@inria.fr > Subject: [Caml-list] Cyclic ?! > > Hi > > I'm puzzled by the following compiler behavior: > > If I define bin_tree as > > type 'a bin_tree = > Empty > > | Node of 'a bin_tree * 'a * 'a bin_tree > > the compiler accepts it. OTOH if I define it as > > type 'a bin_tree = ('a bin_tree * 'a * 'a bin_tree) option > > It gives an error: "The type abbreviation bin_tree is cyclic". > Why??? And what's the difference between the two, really? > > Thanks > Oleg > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: > http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: > http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners