Browse thread
[Caml-list] real-time ocaml RE: ocaml, simd, & fftwgel
- Gurr, David (MED, self)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-08-02 (02:56) |
From: | Gurr, David (MED, self) <David.Gurr@m...> |
Subject: | [Caml-list] real-time ocaml RE: ocaml, simd, & fftwgel |
Travis Bemann: > Note that there is no such thing as a C allocator in OCaml, even > though you can have "custom blocks" that have custom C finalization > code (and which are also not looked inside by OCaml itself). ... I chop my code into real and non-real time parts. The real time part does no allocation. At initialization time I call a C function that mallocs all the memory the real time portion will use and returns a slew of pointers. The pointers will not be followed by GC since they are outside the heap. That is good since the stuff they point to will never contain pointers to memory allocated at run time and thus no pointers to OCaml allocated memory. This is what I would do in any language. If you use Camoflage, you can even use OCaml type defs to do the memory layout. By doing this, I dont care about the GC or compaction or finialization or ... . The only time there is a problem is if ocamlopt heap allocs a float and the work arounds for that are no worse than writing a small chunk of code in C. It is less painful than handwritten C. -D ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners