Daniel de Rauglaudre writes:
 > Hi,
 > 
 > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:46:38PM +0100, Markus Mottl wrote:
 > 
 > > I am just asking whether the OCaml-team considers major syntax
 > > improvements in their development strategy at all.
 > 
 > No.

Well, that's a relief. I really had been getting slightly nervous
because of this thread. I really prefer the 'old' syntax, though I see
the merits of the new syntax when it comes to defining syntax
extensions. Too much parentheses in the revised sysntax if you ask me.

And as far as I see it, ocamlp4 is really a great tool, if I ever
consider experimenting with a new syntax.

Regards -- Markus


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners