Browse thread
[Caml-list] otags problem
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-08-08 (22:54) |
From: | M E Leypold @ labnet <leypold@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] syntax change (was: camlp4o problem) |
Daniel de Rauglaudre writes: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:46:38PM +0100, Markus Mottl wrote: > > > I am just asking whether the OCaml-team considers major syntax > > improvements in their development strategy at all. > > No. Well, that's a relief. I really had been getting slightly nervous because of this thread. I really prefer the 'old' syntax, though I see the merits of the new syntax when it comes to defining syntax extensions. Too much parentheses in the revised sysntax if you ask me. And as far as I see it, ocamlp4 is really a great tool, if I ever consider experimenting with a new syntax. Regards -- Markus ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners