Markus Mottl writes:
 > On Mon, 04 Feb 2002, Mattias Waldau wrote:
 > > So, I think we should encourage people to try the Camlp4-syntax
 > > and let people have their comments. If people comment into this
 > > mailing list, more people will look into it and maybe have their
 > > own opinion.
 > 
 > This will probably not happen: there is just not enough incentive to
 > learn a new syntax which is unlikely to become widespread - because it
 > is non-standard.


Maybe that should be read as: There is no widespread need for a
revised sytnax, the hurt with the old syntax is not big enough to
justify a transition to a new one (for most people)?

Regards -- Markus

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners