Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] How to implement "Singleton" design pattern?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Hendrik Tews <tews@t...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] How to implement "Singleton" design pattern?
SooHyoung Oh writes:
   Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 14:29:13 +0900
   Subject: [Caml-list] How to implement  "Singleton" design pattern?
   And then how can we solve the (1)?
   There are some possible solutions:
   (a) invisible class definition in a module
   (b) the class definition which can't be called with "new" (private class ?)
   (c) local class definition (in another class definition ?)
   Which one/ones is/are feasible and/or good in Ocaml?
   And are there any other solutions?
If it is enough to detect the error at runtime:
You can use an initializer that raises an exception if a second
object is created. 


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: