Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Q: safe language
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Nicolas Cannasse <warplayer@f...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Q: safe language
> > So for
> > example, C is not safe because you can derefence a bad pointer etc. and
> > cause a seg fault.
>  Run C in a bytecode "safe" environment (there are some C implementations
> with this functionality) - and it will become a "safe language"?

If you choose the following definition "safe : which does not fail" then you

C < "safe" C < Lisp < OCaml

But you can't ensure the total safety of your program without using a
theorem prover such as COQ.
Simple OCaml sample :

List.hd [];;

Nicolas Cannasse

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: