Browse thread
[Caml-list] O'Caml vs C++: a little benchmark
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-08-19 (15:12) |
From: | William Chesters <williamc@p...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] O'Caml vs C++: a little benchmark |
Xavier Leroy writes: > > the compiler doesn't inline Array.fold_left, and hence not your > > anonymous "fun" either, because it doesn't inline anything between > > compilation units. > > Just for the record: ocamlopt does perform inlining across compilation > units (via the information stored in .cmx files). What it doesn't do, > however, is inlining and specialization of recursive function definitions. Thanks for correcting that misapprehension, and apologies for propagating it. (I did do some tests, a long time ago---did I just get it wrong, or is this a relatively recent feature??) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners