Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Namespace proposal
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Gurr, David (MED, self) <David.Gurr@m...>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Namespace proposal

>  No subpackages. Dots in the name does not mean any hierarchy 
> - but just
> a "name search path" hints. Just the same modules as we have 
> now, but with
> a slightly more intelligent way of name resolving.

Isnt that the equiv of the universally acclaimed all singing 
acme of perfection Java package == directory system?
To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: