Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] "No bytecode specified"
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] "No bytecode specified"
> Alternatively, strip can be fixed to know about ocaml bytecode.

I wouldn't recommend that -- if I were the maintainer of "strip", I'd
scream at such a kludge :-)

> I was also told that if the ocaml team would have used another
> label/tag/whatever it is called in the binary code than the one it is
> using, then strip would know about it.

Yes, a cleaner solution would be to embed the OCaml bytecode in a
special ELF section.  But there are two problems with this: 1- the ELF
file format is quite complex, and 2- this solution would break utterly
on non-ELF systems, e.g. Windows.

The current solution (just stick the bytecode at the end of the native
executable) is a hack, but it's a hack that works on *every single
platform* I've tested in the last 12 years...

- Xavier Leroy
To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: