[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Chris Hecker <checker@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] mixin modules paper and future? |
> > I think that this is an incredibly important feature for > > caml to make headway into large systems development. >Do you think so? You misunderstood what I thought was important, or I was unclear, or both. ;) I think shipping the mixin system (or any system that allows module recursion) is important, not the open problems themselves. All of the examples you mentioned (well, I don't know about Cobol, but all the others) allow you to have recursive systems spread across multiple files to reduce compile times, limit file length, and break things out conceptually. The concept of a "forward declaration" is critical to writing large scale software effectively, I think. Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners