Browse thread
[Caml-list] Hashtbl.hash and Hashtbl.hash_param
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alain Frisch <frisch@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Hashtbl.hash and Hashtbl.hash_param |
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 jeanmarc.eber@lexifi.com wrote: > Conclusion: personally, I don’t want progress of the compiler made difficult by > a 100% backward compatibility "religion". What do other users of ocaml think > about it? I strongly agree with you, especially concerning the situation at issue (improving Hashtbl.hash). You're right that it is explicitely stated in the manual, for Marshal: << The format for the byte sequences is compatible across all machines for a given version of Objective Caml. >> -- Alain ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners