[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-08-07 (13:34) |
From: | Michael Vanier <mvanier@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-mode-3.05 |
> Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 22:25:18 -0700 > From: "Alexander V. Voinov" <avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> > > Hi All, > > Jacques Garrigue wrote: > > > > From: Jeffrey Palmer <jeffrey.palmer@acm.org> > > > > > Can anyone give a quick comparison of the Tuareg ocaml mode and > > > ocaml-mode-3.05? Is the indentation better/standardized in one > > > vs. the other, support for font-locking, etc. > > > > I'm not a Tuareg mode user myself (not surprising) > > I'm not in a position to argue on either of these modes, but I use > tuareg and it satisfies all my needs. I only remember that I switched to > it from some other mode which was less satisfactory. > Although the standard ocaml mode is fine for me when it works, there's one thing about it that really annoys me: occasionally the indenting engine gets confused and then totally refuses to do the right thing from then on. I have to manually re-load the caml-mode emacs files to fix it. Another thing I don't like is that caml-mode doesn't treat nested comments correctly as far as syntax coloring is concerned. I guess I should give tuareg a try. Mike ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners