English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Re: ocaml, simd, & fftwgel RE: [Caml-list] Caml productivity.
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2002-08-01 (15:36)
From: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...>
Subject: Re: ocaml, simd, & fftwgel RE: [Caml-list] Caml productivity.
>From: John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>

>Huh? Which parts of a real time interactive game aren't real time??
>The whole thing, from gameplay interaction to graphics and sound,
>must be done in 'real-time'.

I'd say no part of a real-time interactive game is real-time.  To me,
real-time means something like the Ariane 5 rocket, where you have a
deadline every 36ms for the 12 hours of the mission.  And if you miss
even one deadline your 100M$ rocket will crash.

On the other hand, in something like Unreal Tournament, a half-second
freeze every 10 minutes is no big deal, and the users will not even
complain about it.

With Objective Caml on a fast machine, if you're not doing heap
compaction, GC pauses should be somewhere between 1 and 10
milliseconds.  Quite workable for an interactive game, I'd say, but
then again it's not the future of my company that is at stake.

-- Damien
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners