[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-08-07 (13:38) |
From: | Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@k...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-mode-3.05 |
From: David Fox <david@lindows.com> > I did notice that when I loaded a buffer > in ocaml-mode the comments were not colorized properly, though when I > toggled font-lock mode off and on they came out right. This is a bit strange: when you load a file, ocaml-mode colorize the whole buffer, just as when toggle on-and-off, or use font-lock-fontify buffer. So the result should not differ. However, as soon as you edit the text, colorization is done individually on each modified line, and may come out incorect. > This is also my main problem with tuareg mode - mysterious > colorization behavior. You're pretty much limited by font-lock's capabilities. Which means no support for incremental multiline colorizing. No surprise you encounter the same problems. > I'm pretty sure the indentation will not be a big issue for me. Then any mode should please you: in ocaml-mode colorizing is less than 100 lines (just regular expression, that you may twiddle yourself if you want), while indentation is more than 1000 (most of caml.el). There is a huge gap in complexity, because caml syntax is so unstructured. Jacques Garrigue ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners