Browse thread
[Caml-list] finalisers, Weak pointers
- John Hale
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Hale <hale@j...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] finalisers, Weak pointers |
Hi, does there exist any way to ensure that finalisers registered via the (undocumented) Gc.finalise are called in order of their registration? I have a program that deals in data structures that are collectively too big to all fit in main memory at once, and so I'd like to allow the garbage collector to decide when to write them out to disk files by (1) storing them in an array of Weak pointers and (2) attaching finalisers who linearize the contents of array cells using the Marshal module. as Damien Doligez writes in the stdlib/gc.mli, > A number of pitfalls are associated with finalised values: > finalisation functions are called asynchronously, sometimes > even during the execution of other finalisation functions. (cf. http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200001/msg00011.html) what I'm finding is that the finalisers sometimes get called in wacky orders such that `older' occupants of the Weak array overwrite (on disk) what should be the current occupants. Is this just the "asynchronous" nature of the finalisers? Is there any way to implement this kind of weak-pointer, disk-based backing store without having to "write-through" each time? In my particular case the data structures are variable-length so it seems only right that it be the Gc's decision whether they are too big to keep in-core. thanks, -john ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners