Browse thread
[Caml-list] intersecting huge integer sets
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] intersecting huge integer sets |
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Yaron M. Minsky wrote:
> If the sets are really as dense as you say they are (on the order of 50%
> of all possible elements), then the fastest thing is probably just to
> use a bool array. Such an approach would require 3 passes: one to set
> all the elements of the array to false. One to mark the elements
> corresponding to set 1 to true, and then one pass over set 2 to see
> which of its elements are shared by 1.
If this is what is needed, better take bit vectors ("bitv" - also on
Jean-Christophe's page).
Regards,
Markus Mottl
--
Markus Mottl markus@oefai.at
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence http://www.oefai.at/~markus
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners