Browse thread
[Caml-list] Doubly-linked list
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons <Diego-Olivier.FERNANDEZ-PONS@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Doubly-linked list |
Brian Rogoff a écrit :
> With OCaml 3.05 and above, you'll be able to use polymorphic methods to
> get non-uniform recursion. This issue has come up a lot on the list
> (see the archives) over the years and several proposals were made for
> adding this capability to the language. I don't know if adding this
> feature is a priority for the developers; it isn't clear that the data
> structures in Okasaki's book constitute a strong enough argument for
> adding it.
Non-uniform recursion allows you to capture structure invariants in
your type, which means that the correction of the algorithms will not
be proved by the programmer but by the type-checker.
I think it is a big improvment. Chris Okasaki's data structure may not
be a strong enough argument, but more complicated data structures are
being studied.
You can find some (simple) examples in a paper by Ralf Hinze
"Manufacturing data types", namely braun trees, 2-3 trees, matrices
Concerning double linked lists, for the moment I am working on things
I think are more important.
Diego Olivier
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners