English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml-3.05: a performance experience
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2002-08-05 (16:24)
From: Mike Lin <mikelin@M...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-3.05: a performance experience

> I'm intrigued by the relationship between these two parsers. In
> note that my Felix compiler takes 'pull' code, and automatically
> translates it
> to the much more efficient 'push' model: ie. it switches the client/server
> relationship around, a process I call control inversion.

I'm just curious if you could elaborate on in what respect a push parser is
"much more efficient"? From my experience pull parsers tend to be easier to
use because they don't impose an event-driven model on the driver program,
and also it is trivial to build a push parser on top of a pull parser.


To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners