[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Michael Vanier <mvanier@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] objective caml and industry |
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:13:43 +0400 (MSD) > From: Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@ontil.ihep.su> > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Michael Vanier wrote: > > > Change takes time. I think chasing after industry acceptance of ocaml is > > the wrong strategy. > > It already accepted functional programming. Look at what Microsoft > Research have done - isn't them represent the industry? Microsoft has a research interest in functional programming. Though that's perhaps encouraging, it's a far cry from trying to promote FP as something programmers should learn. C# (which they do promote as something programmers should learn) is a long, long way from FP. Still, every little bit helps. Mike ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners