> Yes, i would actually ear your arguments about that point, because it does
> not seems clear to me : the AddRef/Release semantic of COM is a reference
> counting to enable the sharing of object and thus determine its time-life
>  the last Release() call will trigger effective memory release of the
> object ).

But ocaml variable and COM reference are merely different things.

> Simply modify ocamole in order to not call "i->Release()" if
CoUninitialize
> had been made, or ( better ) GC'd all your COM objects before calling
> ComUninit.

This does not work. Even not to call CoUninitialize does not work. There is
the same access violation (not segfault as i've early mentioned) error
everywhere: "The object invoked has disconnected from its clients". I am in
no way ocaml or COM expert, but it seems this is because ocaml not only GCs
_unneeded variable_ but also Releases _still needed_ interface.

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners