Browse thread
[Caml-list] packing Ocaml standard library into Std "namespace"
-
Dmitry Bely
-
Maxence Guesdon
- Sven LUTHER
- Dmitry Bely
-
Maxence Guesdon
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-08-25 (09:55) |
From: | Dmitry Bely <dbely@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] packing Ocaml standard library into Std "namespace" |
Maxence Guesdon <maxence.guesdon@inria.fr> writes: >> Ocaml 3.05 and above introduces new packing facility (ocamlc "-pack" >> option). What do you think of using it to pack all Ocaml standard modules >> into one big Std module so that the user code could use them as >> Std.List.something, Std.Array.something etc. (having an analog of C++ >> std:: namespace)? > > Hum, Using Std.List.iter instead of just List.iter would be a pain > for me since I never 'open' standard modules. I could still open Std > at the beginning of each module but the best would then for the Std > module to be open by default (like Pervasives is). Well, altough I think Std should not be open by default (to not pollute user namespace), I realise that a lot of existing code will have to be modified then. Some time ago C++ community survived a similar change, but ... maybe to control this via a compiler option, say "-nostd" (like "-nopervasives")? > But there may be a problem (correct me if i'm wrong): > if I don't use, say Arg, in my program, the Arg module doesn't appear > in the executable. But if it is packed in std.cmo then Std.Arg will > be in my executable (as part of Std), as all the other standard > modules I don't use. Is that true ? Hmm, I did not tested that, but does not "ocamlc -pack -a" create the necessary library, where all submodules are independent? At least ocamlc/ocamlopt accepts such set of options :-) >> I think this will help us reduce the name clash dramatically. E.g. I have >> just discovered that I cannot modify ocamlild compiler to use Array.of_list >> somethere inside, because it already contains array.ml source file, that >> overlaps standard Array module. Having Std module, I just would write >> Std.Array.of_string there. > And can't you pack the new array module in another one, hiding the new > Array and letting the standard one visible ? No, because other ocamlild modules use that array.ml. So I have to modify many files to get access to the standard Array module... - Dmitry Bely ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners