Browse thread
[Caml-list] Q: safe language
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Q: safe language |
On 30 Aug 2002, David Frese wrote: > > (cadr '(1)) > > This shows that Lisp is safe, because it results in an error, and does > not return some value from out of nowhere (or does it). No. In this place program may be expecting some structure, which can contain NIL. There is no other way in lisp to define structures - so, any code accepting lists will accept any alien structure. Is is type safety? No way! Dynamically typed languages can't be safe. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners