On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, M E Leypold @ labnet wrote:

>  >  No subpackages. Dots in the name does not mean any hierarchy - but just
>  > a "name search path" hints. Just the same modules as we have now, but with
>  > a slightly more intelligent way of name resolving.
> 
> 
> 'name resolving' and 'path search' should be part of the surrounding
> build system, not the language. I do not want to see any (build time)
> paths in my *.ml source files.

 Modules are reffered from the *.ml files - so, they may (not "must") have
some hints about the search order. And if we'll have some syntax for this
hints, that will be enough to avoid all the current problems with module 
naming.



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners