Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Wasn't O'Caml a functional language?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Michaël_Grünewald <michael-grunewald@w...>
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Wasn't O'Caml a functional language? 
Alessandro Baretta <alex@baretta.com> writes:



[...]

> Anyway, my main claim, although misdirected, in not entirely
> faulty. Queue.transfer can be thought of as analogous to
> List.append. When I write let list = list1 @ list2 I do not expect
> side-effects on list1 or list2.

Then you maybe should use Lists, why, if queues have the same behavior than
lists, give them a different name ?
-- 
Michaël Grünewald <michael-grunewald@wanadoo.fr>  - RSA PGP Key ID: 0x20D90C12
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners