[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Kenneth Oksanen <cessu@h...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] autoconf and caml |
>> I'm writing a piece of software using O'Caml and GNU autoconf (among
>> others). In C the results of running `./configure' are conveniently
>> accessed with `#include "config.h"'. My current solution is to
>> preprocess also the O'Caml code, but this requires some clumsy hacks
>> in Makefiles etc. Is there a better way? If not, then I'ld suggest
>> some flag in O'Caml which would run the source files through cpp.
>
>The -pp flag to ocamlc and ocamlopt lets you do this easily:
> ocamlc -pp /lib/cpp ...
True, and this had already been kindly pointed out by some other
camlers. A few remarks though:
This flag is not documented on the corresponding man-pages.
The flag does not exist in ocamlyacc and ocamllex.
ocamllex produces code that is not cpp-safe. It contains definitions
of the form
Lexing.lex_base =
"\000\000\255\255\254\255\002\000\248\255\001\000\247\255\246\255\
\250\255\252\255\245\255\251\255\249\255\077\000\244\255\003\000\
etc. At least when passed through GNU CPP version 2.96 20000731 (Red
Hat Linux 7.3 2.96-110) these become converted to
Lexing.lex_base =
"\000\000\255\255\254\255\002\000\248\255\001\000\247\255\246\255 \250\255\252\255\245\255\251\255\249\255\077\000\244\255\003\000 \030\000\031\000\160\000\235\000\054\001\129\001\204\001\023\002 \098\002\011\000\225\255\230\255\173\002\248\002\067\003\142\003 \217\003\036\004\111\004\186\004\005\005\080\005\155\005\230\005 \049\006\124\006\199\006\018\007\232\255\237\255\234\255\231\255 \236\255";
The extra whitespaces in the string constants are crucial. The intent
of the output of ocamllex was that they would *not* be included in the
strings, but cpp mangles those strings so that they are included in
the strings, thereby producing a broken lexer.
-=-
; Kenneth Oksanen, email: cessu@iki.fi, http://www.iki.fi/~cessu
((lambda(a) (a a((lambda(a)(lambda()(set! a(+ a 1))a))1)))(lambda(a c)
((lambda(b) (newline)(write b)(a a((lambda(c)(lambda()(c c)))(lambda(a)
((lambda(c) (if(=(modulo c b)0)(a a)c))(c))))))(c)))) ; Scheme me!
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners