[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Chris Hecker <checker@d...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] float tuples as double_arrays? |
The floats in an all-float tuple are boxed, unlike floats in all-float
records. The latter are treated as float arrays internally and have
double_array_tag. I'm wondering why the former aren't treated the same
way? Complexity in the compiler and not wanting the double_array special
case code to metastasize more is a perfectly valid answer.
The only reason I ask is that the unboxed rep is more efficient, and tuples
are more convenient for some things, like breaking things out with patterns:
let x,y,z = v in
(* use x y z here *)
while with an array you'd have
let [|x;y;z;|] = v in
(* this generates an incomplete match warning because the size isn't typed *)
or with a record
let {x=x;y=y;z=z;} = v in
(* need the module name on the field above if not opened, etc. *)
Chris
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners