Browse thread
[Caml-list] "No bytecode specified"
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2002-09-03 (16:25) |
From: | Oliver Bandel <oliver@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] "No bytecode specified" |
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Xavier Leroy wrote: > > OK, no answers, that has helped, > > so I now come with more details: > > At last, some technical data in a message of yours. You're (slowly) > improving. If you could just have posted this to caml-bugs@inria.fr > rather than caml-list, this would have been perfect :-) > > The cause of the problem is here: > > > readlink("/proc/self/exe", "[0303]:2916", 1024) = 11 Yes, I thought, that this was a problem. Looks very uncommon. > > I.e. /proc/self/exe does not point to the executable name, but to an > inode number. That must be a truly ancient Linux kernel that you're > running. (Pre 2.0 ?) Yes, 2.0.18 on this old machine. Updating? Hmhhh this old machine itself may be updated by a newer one (faster hardware). ;-) > > I'll harden the determination of the program name against this > problem. I once had used ocamlmktop, and I don' know if it was on my new computer or on this old machine. I think it was the old one, where it once worked, but I think it was Ocaml 3.01, that worked. Maybe in Ocaml 3.04 there were some changes... Somewhere in the strace-output I found "ptrace". I don't know a "ptrace" on linux-machines, but if I remember correctly, there is a ptrace on Solaris- machines. Maybe it's only a problem of the configure-script, which thinks to use tools, not available on common linux-distributions? > In the meantime, do yourself a favor and upgrade to a more > recent Linux kernel (and distribution?). Well, maybe this is a good idea. I may try it with a debian. But I'm not shure if new linux-distributions will work well on this old machine. It works. Not very fast, but still good enough for a lot of tasks. So, when updating the software means to have necessity of buying new hardware this is not, what I want... (not enough money this times, hope it will change soon). But I may try the new debian. :) Ciao, Oliver ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners