[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | tim@f... |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] When do you need a subtype before :>? |
It seems that sometimes when I use :> I need to use the form
(e :> t)
and sometimes I need to use this form:
(e : t1 :> t2)
Can anyone tell me how to predict when I need the more complicated
version? I needed it in the code below, and that surprised me.
module type CONSCIOUS = sig
type eventtype = [`VECTOR | `SCALAR | `UNIT]
type +'a type_constraint
class type [+'a] eventdesc =
object
method type_constraining_field: 'a type_constraint
end
class type [+'a] described_event =
object
method desc: 'a eventdesc
end
end
module Foo = functor (C: CONSCIOUS) -> struct
let _ =
let e: [`SCALAR] C.eventdesc = failwith "x" in
let f = (e (* No subtype needed here. *) :> C.eventtype C.eventdesc) in
()
let _ =
let e: [`SCALAR] C.described_event = failwith "ouch" in
(* The : [`SCALAR] C.described_event on the next non-comment line is
required, even though the same type appears on the previous
non-comment line. *)
let f = (e: [`SCALAR] C.described_event :> C.eventtype C.described_event)
in
()
end
--
Tim Freeman
tim@fungible.com
GPG public key fingerprint ECDF 46F8 3B80 BB9E 575D 7180 76DF FE00 34B1 5C78
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners