Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] choosing modules at runtime
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] choosing modules at runtime |
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Sebastien.deMentendeHorne@electrabel.com wrote: > I looked at functors and they suffered of staticity. It seems you are coming from an OO-background... ;-) > The plugin we use are dynamically (runtime) selected and they > should/could be even generated at runtime, compiled, loaded and > selected... I think that plugins are most often used in a dynamic way > so definitely, first-class modules would be great. Actually, I'd say that most problems of "programming in the large" can be and are best solved statically. But in some cases, one needs more dynamic means of parameterization. Then, first-class modules or objects enter the game. Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl markus@oefai.at Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence http://www.oefai.at/~markus ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners