[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Oleg <oleg_inconnu@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] objective caml and industry |
On Friday 30 August 2002 10:26 pm, John Max Skaller wrote: > The coming English translation of the new O'Reilly Ocaml > book is the most significant step forward here since > Bagley's Shootout showed Ocaml is the top performing > language after C. While Bagley's Shootout was good PR because of its Slashdot exposure, as I mentioned recently [1], Bagley confuses doubly-linked lists and deques, and then goes on to benchmark C++ doubly-linked list against O'Caml pre-allocated array. I don't want to say anything about scientific integrity, since I think INRIA simply overlooked the poor quality and extreme lopsidedness of the Shootout (They reference it on O'Caml's front page) Regards, Oleg [1] http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200208/msg00332.html The Shootout page I referenced changed a bit since Aug 19, 2002, but, still, it was the misleading results that were publicized. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners