> >Does "let a and b in" guarantee a is evaluated before b, like "let a in let
> >b in" does?
>Sorry but I don't understand the purpose of your question.

I was simply asking if the 'and' construct guarantees order or not (is a 
"sequence point" in C terminology), that's all.

Chris

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners